体育赛事投注记录

体育赛事投注记录advertisement

A Review of Distributed Supercomputing Platforms Using Blockchain

  • Kiran Kumar KondruEmail author
  • R. Saranya
  • Annamma Chacko
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 127)

Abstract

体育赛事投注记录advances in blockchain technologies like the introduction of smart contracts and providing alternative solutions to payment systems have given rise to the idea of using blockchain and smart contracts as a backbone for distributed supercomputing. just like ipfs is used for distributed storage over the internet, the concept of distributing computing safely came into existence. distributed supercomputing is not new but using blockchain technology as a way of registering and rewarding the participating computers and users is novel. here, we analyse four of the many projects, namely gridcoin, golem, sonm and iexec and point out their strengths and failings.

Keywords

Blockchain Distributed supercomputing Golem Grid iExec SONM 

References

  1. 1.
    Zawistowski J (2016) The GOLEM Project. Golem Whitepaper 28
  2. 2.
    sonm-whitepaper @ whitepaper.io.
  3. 3.
    Gridcoin: the computation power of a blockchain driving science and data analysis, pp 1–12
  4. 4.
    Fedak G, He H, Moca M, Bendella W (2018) Eduardo Alves: iExec—blockchain-based decentralized cloud computing, p 40
  5. 5.
    Anderson D, Cobb J, Korpela E, Lebofsky M (2002) SETI @ home. Commun ACH 45:56–61
  6. 6.
    Eze K (2018) High-throughput computing, pp 2–4
  7. 7.
    Thain D, Tannenbaum T, Livny M (2005) Distributed computing in practice the condor experience. Concurrency comput Practice Exp
  8. 8.
    Anderson DP (2004) BOINC: a system for public-resource computing and storage. In: IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, pp 4–10 (2004).  
  9. 9.
    SETI@home.
  10. 10.
    Anderson DP (2018) BOINC: a platform for volunteer computing, pp 1– 37
  11. 11.
    Taufer M, An C, Kerstens A, Brooks CL (2006) PredictorHome: a protein structure prediction supercomputer based on global computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 17:786–796.  
  12. 12.
    Folding@Home. , last accessed 30 Dec 2019
  13. 13.
    Climateprediction.net. Last accessed 30 Dec 2019
  14. 14.
    Xu C, Yang C, Li J, Sun M, Bambacus M (2011) Climate@Home: crowdsourcing climate change research
  15. 15.
    LHC@Home.
  16. 16.
    Rosetta@Home. . Last accessed 30 Dec 2019
  17. 17.
    Einstein@Home.
  18. 18.
    BOINC.
  19. 19.
    BOINC Client.
  20. 20.
    O’Dwyert KJ, Malone D (2014) Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. IET Conf Publ 2014:280–285.  
  21. 21.
    Chohan U (2018) Environmentalism in cryptoanarchism: Gridcoin case study. SSRN Electron J.  
  22. 22.
    Alahmad MA, Al-Saleh A (2018) AlMasoud FA (2018) Comparison between PoW and PoS systems of cryptocurrency. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 10:1251–1256  
  23. 23.
    Proof of Research—Gridcoin.
  24. 24.
    Wood G (2017) Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. EIP-150 REVISION. 2017, p 33
  25. 25.
    Benet J (2014) IPFS—content addressed, versioned, P2P file system
  26. 26.
    Fog Computing.
  27. 27.
    ERC-20 Token.
  28. 28.
    SONM Smart Contracts.
  29. 29.
    INRIA. . Last accessed 11 Nov 2019
  30. 30.
    CNRS. . Last accessed 11 Nov 2019
  31. 31.
    XtremWeb-HEP: middleware for distributed data processing.
  32. 32.
    Smart Contract.
  33. 33.
    Request for Comments.
  34. 34.
    Internet Engineering Task Force.
  35. 35.
    Newsome J, Shi E, Song D, Perrig A (2004) The sybil attack. 259:  

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiran Kumar Kondru
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Saranya
    • 1
  • Annamma Chacko
    • 1
  1. 1.Central University of Tamil NaduThiruvarurIndia

Personalised recommendations