体育赛事投注记录

advertisement

A Comparative Analysis of Accessibility and Stability of Different Networks

  • Subasish MohapatraEmail author
  • Harkishen Singh
  • Pratik Srichandan
  • Muskan Khedia
  • Subhadarshini Mohanty
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 127)

Abstract

these days, there is a wide assortment of system available, it is growing exponentially, and to analyze the network performance, different type benchmarking tools are used, which allows scientists and system managers numerous choices to work with. to investigate the system execution scarcely, many components are there which influences the exhibition of pc systems. those elements will decrease the quality of service of the network. the central point is latency, packet misfortune, re-transmission, throughput and queuing delay. in any case, this assortment keeps an eye on troublesome choice procedure of the proper device. besides, in some cases, clients are compelled to attempt a few devices so as to locate an ideal outcome giving tools which will ascertain a given measure, so they need to figure out how to control various instruments and how to decipher acquired outcomes. this paper offers a benchmarking tool which will monitor network and help in load handling of application on the individual route, test various possibilities of data in params (permutate params) with response behaves by the network, analyze network performance of the hosted application irrespective of containerization and representation of performance with the help of graph, which will guide to select this tool over others.

Keywords

Component Ping Monitoring Report changes Request–response delay Network congestion Bottlenecking Time-series database (TSDB) Routes 

References

  1. 1.
    Gamess, Eric, and Karima Velásquez. “IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding performance evaluation on different operating systems.” In XXXIV Conferencia Latinoamericana de Informática (CLEI 2008). 2008
  2. 2.
    Botta A, Pescape A, Ventre G (2005) On the performance of bandwidth estimation tools. In: The proceedings of the international conference on Systems Communications (ICW’05, ICHSN’05, ICMCS’05, SENET’05), IEEE, pp 287–292
  3. 3.
    Gupta D, Wu D, Mohapatra P, Chuah CN (2009) Experimental comparison of bandwidth estimation tools for wireless mesh networks. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2009, IEEE, pp 2891–2895
  4. 4.
    Li M, Claypool M, Kinicki R (2008) WBest: a bandwidth estimation tool for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. In: 2008 33rd IEEE conference on local computer networks (LCN), IEEE, pp 374–381
  5. 5.
    Goldoni E, Rossi G, Torelli A (2009) Assolo, a new method for available bandwidth estimation. In: The proceedings of the international conference on internet monitoring and protection, IEEE, pp 130–136
  6. 6.
    Jain M, Dovrolis C (2002) Pathload: a measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth. In: Proceedings of passive and active measurements (PAM) workshop

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subasish Mohapatra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Harkishen Singh
    • 1
  • Pratik Srichandan
    • 1
  • Muskan Khedia
    • 1
  • Subhadarshini Mohanty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringCollege of Engineering and TechnologyBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations