体育赛事投注记录

体育赛事投注记录advertisement

On-Demand Joint Predictive Flooding in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

  • H. N. JithendraEmail author
  • D. Rekha
Conference paper
  • 35 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1162)

Abstract

vehicular ad hoc networks (vanet) are flavor of mobile ad hoc networks. with the increase in the development of mobile technology in the last decade or so, we see increased interest in the development in vanet protocols as well. in this paper, we propose a routing protocol that uses predictive position information of neighboring nodes for data dissemination. the highly dynamic topology of vanet results in route discovered by a routing protocol to be intermittent. hence, in this work we propose a predictive flooding in vanet (pfv) which has a flavor of flooding protocol for data transfer. our results show that the pfv considerably reduces the network load in terms of forwards with an increase in the performance of data dissemination as well.

Keywords

VANET Kalman filter MANET PFV 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang, D., Zhang, T., Liu, X.: Novel self-adaptive routing service algorithm for application in VANET. Appl. Intell. 49(5), 1866–1879 (2019)
  2. 2.
    Wang, H., et al.: A improved routing scheme based on link stability for VANET. In: 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). IEEE (2019)
  3. 3.
    Li, N., et al.: Probability prediction-based reliable and efficient opportunistic routing algorithm for VANETs. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (TON) 26(4), 1933–1947 (2018)
  4. 4.
    Samara, C., Karapistoli, E., Economides, A.A.: Performance comparison of MANET routing protocols based on real-life scenarios. Ultra modern telecommunications and control systems and workshops
  5. 5.
    Kampitaki, D.G., Economides, A.A.: Simulation study of MANET routing protocols under FTP traffic. In: Presented at the Conference on Electrical Telecommunication Computation, CETC, Lisbon, Portugal (2013)
  6. 6.
    Broch, J., Maltz, D.A., Johnson, D.B., Hu, Y.C., Jetcheva, J.: A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing” protocols. Proc. ACM/IEEE MobiCom 1998, 85–97 (1998)
  7. 7.
    Mbarushimana, C., Shahrabi, A.: Comparative study of reactive and proactive routing protocols performance in mobile Ad Hoc networks. Advanced Information on Networking Application Workshops, AINAW ‘07, pp. 679–684 (2007)
  8. 8.
    Bilandi, N., Harsh, K.V.: Comparative analysis of reactive, proactive and hybrid routing protocols in MANET. Int. J. Electr. Comp. Sci. Eng. 1(03), 1660–1667 (2012)
  9. 9.
    Perkins, C.E., Royer, E.M., Das, S.R., Marina, M.K.: Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. IEEE Pers. Commun. 8(1), 16–28 (2001)
  10. 10.
    Maan, F., Mazhar, N.: MANET routing protocols vs mobility models: a performance evaluation. In: Third International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), pp. 179–184 (2011)
  11. 11.
    Fan, B., Sadagopan, N., Helmy, A.: IMPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for Adhoc networks. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM, pp. 825–835 (2003)
  12. 12.
    Ho, Y.H., Ho, A.H., Hua, K.A.: Routing protocols for intervehicular networks: A comparative study in high-mobility and large obstacles environments. Comp. Commun. 31(12), 2767–2780 (2008)
  13. 13.
    Marti, S., Giuli, T.J., Lai, K., Baker, M.: Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom ‘00), pp. 255–265. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2000)
  14. 14.
    Divyalakshmi, D., Manjusha, D.: Adaptive hybrid routing protocol for VANETs. Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. 5(5), 1085–1091 (2017)
  15. 15.
    Sonja, B., Le Boudec, J.-Y.: Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad hoc Networking and Computing. ACM (2002)
  16. 16.
    Mittala, P., Yadav, B.: Improving AODV routing in vehicular ad hoc networks. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 4(9) (2016)
  17. 17.
    Nikolovski, T., Pazzi, R.W., Akabane, A.T., Villas, L.A.: Efficient encounter-based event dissemination protocol (E-BED) for urban and highway vehicular ad hoc networks. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Heraklion, pp. 1085–1090 (2017)
  18. 18.
    Arivudainambi, D., Rekha, D.: Heuristic approach for broadcast scheduling problem in wireless mesh networks. Elsevier Int. J. Electron. Commun. 68(6), 489–495 (2014)
  19. 19.
    Arivudainambi, D., Rekha, D.: Broadcast scheduling problem in TDMA ad hoc networks using immune genetic algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 8(1), 18–29 (2012)
  20. 20.
    Narasappa, J.H., Rekha, D.: Energy aware methodical data forwarding (EAMDF) mechanism in VANET. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 1–11 (2019).  
  21. 21.
    Siva Ram Murthy, C., Manoj, B.S.: Ad hoc Wireless Networks: Architectures and Protocols. Pearson Education (2004)
  22. 22.
    Abolhasan, M., et al.: A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 2(1), 1–22 (2004)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SCSEVIT UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations